Board Thread:Admin Board/@comment-1991301-20140131110816/@comment-1463998-20140131113009

What I think about Wikipedia:


 * They show inconsistency: for example they often use "Records of the Three Kingdoms", but just as often they use "Sanguozhi" (Or Hou Han shu and Book of the Later Han, or Zhang Jiao, Zhang Jue, or.... et cetera).


 * They use way too many citations from Records of the Three Kingdoms: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhou_Yu#References To the commoner, this makes the entire article unverifiable.


 * Some of their users are arrogant :-D. They see the faults in Kongming.net and other TK sites and dismiss them for it, but they don't see the faults in their own work and translations.


 * Many errors in translations... I think this another one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yue_Jin#Early_life it says Yue Jin was active in the Yellow Turban Rebellion, and afterwards fought against Dong Zhuo. Rafe tells it the other way around. Fought against Dong Zhuo, and then helped Cao Cao against Yellow Turban remnants.

They dismiss Kongming.net, but I don't think they're better than them. Better than this site... hmm, yea perhaps :-D

Though I have to say, from the articles you mentioned, our versions (those completed; YTR and Annotations) are better than theirs imo!

On the other hand; they do have a big team and they all seem very dedicated. I think most of them are students and they all have access to JSTOR and their uni's large libraries. That really helps. And they speak Chinese, though not faultless, but they can read SGZ and HHS...